True story: Lululemon used to make baby clothes.
I have the proof, right here.
So, why did they stop making them? I don’t know. Maybe because people don’t want to pay $98 for a pair of baby pants? To be honest, I have no clue how much they used to charge for them. But, it seems that they stopped making them sometime around 2007.
I asked Lululemon about their baby pants, and below is their response.
They told me to goto Ivivva, their children’s brand – but, again nothing for babies.
They told me that they’ll “put in a good word.” I have no idea who they are putting in a good word to? Maybe the designers?
Why do I care?? I don’t know, but I feel that Haddie would enjoy her own Lulu outfit ASAP. Maybe we should start a petition to get Lululemon back on the baby clothes train? Is that your jam?
PS: For all you dads out there, their anti-ball crushing pants are great, as is their underwear.
2 Responses
Cathy
To help you out, there was a ONE TIME run of baby items that came out in conjunction with the birth of Chip Wilson’s twins (I want to say 2006). It hit a certain number of stores and once sold out, it was gone. It was fun, but not something that REALLY made sense to continue in the long-run considering all of the workmanship to make itty bitty items with technical clothing. Still darn fun to have some, right?!! I still have some 6mos items … with babes bigger than that, but what to do with it now?! So cute its hard to get rid of 🙂
iSlutsky
Yup! Good news, we were able to score a pair of pants last week for our little one!!